This is the 3 minute speech I gave to the Lib Dem conference on all women shortlists. It was supporting an amendment which would remove them from a diversity motion we were considering. I took the view that the underlying problem is that the political environment is hostile towards women, and all women shortlists don’t address that, but paper over it.<\/p>\n
We lost, but it was quite close, and some told me that my speech had changed their minds, which I suppose is the mark of a successful debate speech.<\/p>\n
Conference,<\/p>\n
In days of yore, it\u2019s said coal miners took caged canaries down mines, to test the air. Imagine, if you will, one mine that has a problem. Nine miners take down a canary, and the canary, after looking distressed for a bit, dies.<\/p>\n
The miners realise they have a problem. \u201cBetter get another canary\u201d, says one.<\/p>\n
So they do, and that canary dies.<\/p>\n
As does the third, and the fourth.<\/p>\n
Well word gets round the local canary flock, and when they see the miners coming they make themselves scarce. Now the miners really have a problem.<\/p>\n
\u201cI know\u201d, says one of them; \u201cfor every five of us who go down, we will reserve another five spaces for canaries.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cWe\u2019ll fill them from all canary shortlists.\u201d<\/p>\n
Slowly the miners all get unpleasant health problems, because canary targets don\u2019t clean up toxic air.<\/p>\n
I served four years as a councillor. At the end of my term, I feel like I discovered a dirty little secret. I ended my term on antidepressants and so, it seems did a statistically implausible number of my colleagues, in all parties.<\/p>\n
Some of us ended up comparing notes: Citalopram or Mirtazapine, which has worse side effects? That sort of thing. How messed up is that?<\/p>\n
Maybe we need a spent canaries support group.<\/p>\n
Studies show that men often overestimate or overstate their abilities and women underestimate and understate them, and this is reflected in how different genders tend to respond in toxic environments, be it investment banking or be it politics.<\/p>\n
We ask a lot of our candidates: organise deliverers, run campaigns, spend x nights a week knocking on y hundred doors. Our local parties often ask for more time than is reasonable. Men will quite often sign up, and then just not do it all. Women, who tend to have less free time to start with, will look at the expected workload and become stressed.<\/p>\n
I\u2019m no expert in why the response here is gendered; but it is, and we in all parties have built an environment that unconsciously selects men by tailoring it towards male-typical responses to stress. That\u2019s a bad thing for the men too, by the way, they just tend to respond differently to it.<\/p>\n
The problem is not with the women. The problem is with the toxicity of the environment. If we learned anything from New Labour\u2019s love of targets and quotas, it\u2019s that they provide simple solutions to the wrong problem.<\/p>\n
Don\u2019t get more canaries. Fix the toxicity.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
This is the 3 minute speech I gave to the Lib Dem conference on all women shortlists. It was supporting an amendment which would remove them from a diversity motion we were considering. I took the view that the underlying … Continue reading